Thursday, November 25, 2010

ALL ABOUT ED HASLAM,GEORGE KNAPP, GEORGE BARBOUR ...COAST TO COAST NOV. 21, 2010

With reluctance, i consented to an interview on Coast to Coast late on November 21st (22nd for me). There will be no more radio interviews, if I can help it!

The twenty minutes of interview granted (more time would have been inadvisable) required a trip out of the country I was living in, a few hours later, for my safety.

Kudos to EDWARD T. HASLAM, who gave listeners excellent information, including how his book, Dr. Mary's Monkey (which was an outgrowth of his first book, Mary, Ferrie & the Monkey Virus)related to the question in his mind about the underground laboratory he had discovered near David Ferrie's residence: WHERE was the necessary technician who had to be involved? More about the interview, below...plus the video I hope you'll enjoy....

Only today have I been able to re-establish connections with my "cutouts," who post messages and pass emails on to me. You have no idea how important your donations have been to help me 'stay legal' (I can only stay 90 days at a time in an EU country).

CANCER ON THE RAMPAGE

This Thanksgiving, as my family once again gathered without me, I learned that my former husband's brother died of lung and brain cancer the very day of the Coast to Coast interview. His wife is battling a cancer that required surgery just days before her husband died-- both her breasts had to be removed. It doesn't end there... Sadly, I leaned that my former husband, who has also been battling cancer, is losing the battle. he is scheduled for chemotherapy in January, if he is still alive at that time.

What were once rare cancers are no longer rare. The virus component found in so many of these once-rare cancers is well-known, but rarely mentioned by the media to the public.

TRANS-RESVERATROL AND A HEALTHY, ANTI-CANCER DIET

I do wish to clarify some information touched upon in the program, before inviting you to watch the interesting video below.

One available way to help prevent certain kinds of cancer, and PERHAPS to help those suffering from cancer --always consult your doctors--- besides a good 'anti-cancer" diet rich in colorful, organically-grown fruits and vegetables, is a good source of TRANS-resveratrol. That;'s the most active part of resveratrol, mentioned on the program. also, as "reversatrol" --an easy error to make, but one which needs correction here, again, in print.

To elaborate a bit on diet: some additional supplementary items I'd recommend, at this time, in an 'anti-cancer" diet include:

Organic blueberry, blackberry, cranberry and pomegranate juices, organic apple cider,organic purple grape juice, organic apple cider vinegar (be sure to balance with sufficient calcium and magnesium), lightly cooked, grated sugar beets, asparagus, inositol (form of niacin), omega-3 sources such as mercury-free salmon, vitamin D3 (taken on days when it's impossible to get natural sunlight--but not with inositol) and green teas-- free of fluorides -- as wise additions to any diet. (The above list is not all-inclusive.,

Avoid preserved meats and any heat-blackened surfaces on meat or fish. I wouldn't give aspartame or any other artificial sweetener to rats, let alone human beings, not wishing to shorten their lifespans.

Was unable to give any such advice on Coast to Coast: wish it had been possible to do so.

One other comment: concerning BACTERIOPHAGES.... Yes, we could have cured many kinds of soft-tissue cancers decades ago. That's the tragic truth. Chemotherapy makes BIG BUCKS for BIG PHARMA: the bottom line on why we don;t have a true cure for cancer yet. Nevertheless, I urge more research into using not 'macrophjage" which was suggested on the program, but bacteriophage as a resource to cure cancer. Bacteriophage that have been appropriately genetically altered hold the very key to curing certain soft tissue cancers, and will provide us with a basic building block with which to destroy any evolving new cancers that might develop resistance. Bacteriophage could remain in a treated person;s body, after defeating cancer there, for an unknown but probably extended period of time, ready to 'come to life' the moment the cancer might try to reappear. Now that's the kind of virus in a vaccine that people SHOULD think about accepting into their bodies!

WOULD I LIKE TO BE IN A LABORATORY, DIRECTING RESEARCH IN THIS AREA? JUST GIVE ME A FIGHTING CHANCE!

HAVING MADE THESE REMARKS ABOUT 'TRANS-RESVERATROL,' 'ANTI-CANCER DIETS' AND 'GENETICALLY MODIFIED BACTERIOPHAGES'-- LET'S LOOK AT THE VIDEO I HOPE YOU'LL VIEW WITH ENJOYMENT:

In the YouTube video shown here, you'll see both George Knapp (the same individual who interviewed me on Coast to Coast), and also John Barbour, a kind and honest celebrity with a passion for the truth, who spoke after I did, whose appropriate and supportive comments were much appreciated.

This video presents an introduction to Barbour's award-winning documentary, THE GARRISON TAPES--where he states, concerning New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison ---famed in the movie JFK for conducting the ONLY investigation into anyone else besides the innocent Oswald: "if [Garrison] had nothing, they would have stepped aside and let him fall on his face. Instead..."

Well, that "instead" leads to the misery and humiliation and attacks that garrison had to endure. I am quite familiar, myself, with that process. Honest researchers know that what the CIA and the media did to Garrison was illegal and constituted an obstruction of justice.

"Oswald did not fire the rifle" --Garrison

note that this is a good video---except for the statement in the beginning by our fine newsfolks, where they repeat the now-familiar mantra that npeople continue to believe that "Oswald did not act alone" -- a rote statement that has TAKEN THE PLACE OF "Was Oswald the shooter?"

This evolution in the statement is evidence of the tenacious, insidious way that the sold-out media has been brainwashed to re-word the essential question of WHO killed Kennedy. "Did Oswald act alone?" implies that Oswald shot Kennedy, but asks if he was involved or not in a conspiracy. It veers from the truth 180 degrees.

The question should be, "Since we know Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, then who was responsible for protecting those who did?"

That leads to whence the perpetrators do not wish you to go.

As anyone who's read my book, Me & Lee , knows, Lee Oswald was a hero.

Now for the video (by the way, Jim Garrison also said that Lee was a hero!):


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuMH3os2I1o

No comments:

Post a Comment